<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philips 9704 LED Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/21/philips-9704-led-pro-40-inch-40pfl9704-46-inch-46pfl9704/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/21/philips-9704-led-pro-40-inch-40pfl9704-46-inch-46pfl9704/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jin</title>
		<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/21/philips-9704-led-pro-40-inch-40pfl9704-46-inch-46pfl9704/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displayblog.com/?p=7807#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>Thanks a bunch for the quick review! Some say the 40-inch and 46-inch use lower quality Sharp panels? Hmm... Guess it&#039;d be safer to stick with a 52-inch if you can afford to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a bunch for the quick review! Some say the 40-inch and 46-inch use lower quality Sharp panels? Hmm&#8230; Guess it&#8217;d be safer to stick with a 52-inch if you can afford to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmask</title>
		<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/21/philips-9704-led-pro-40-inch-40pfl9704-46-inch-46pfl9704/comment-page-1/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>rmask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displayblog.com/?p=7807#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>I own the 52&quot; 9704 (actually available for about 2 months). Street and online prices are lower than those mentioned (I&#039;ve payed 2550 eur (VAT included) for the 52&quot;).

Quick review:

Plus:
Excelent HD conent display (I don&#039;t watch TV, so I won&#039;t comment on the SD/HD braodcast reception quality (In fact I haven&#039;t tested the built-in tuner at all :) - other owners (see the thread below) find it decent)
Excelent true blacks
Excelent motion handling
Ambilight Spectra 3 (some find it distoring (you can set a static backlight level/color or disable if you do) - I adore it)
No PC HDMI handshake problems
Decent sound system (althou I don&#039;t use mine, I have a dedicated speaker system)
Nice colors (after calibration)
No blooming
No (low) reflections
Decent viewing angles
Superb (imho) exterior design
Built-in Wifi/Ethernet and Internet features  (Although I don&#039;t use those :) )


Some cons:
Default color gammut is not &quot;on spot&quot; (calibration needed, too much &quot;blue tint&quot; by default)
No HD MKV playback from usb/wifi/net
Some HW board failures (green strip) for a few owners (see the thread below)
Price (although it is a premium tv)
Different (some say lower quality) sharp panel in 40&quot; and 46&quot; (some banding for a few owners)
Thick (the 52&quot; is about 11 cm) and heavy (~50 kilos)

PS. Here&#039;s a very nice owners thread with lots of info:
http://www.hifi-forum.de/viewthread-152-5345-91.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the 52&#8243; 9704 (actually available for about 2 months). Street and online prices are lower than those mentioned (I&#8217;ve payed 2550 eur (VAT included) for the 52&#8243;).</p>
<p>Quick review:</p>
<p>Plus:<br />
Excelent HD conent display (I don&#8217;t watch TV, so I won&#8217;t comment on the SD/HD braodcast reception quality (In fact I haven&#8217;t tested the built-in tuner at all :) &#8211; other owners (see the thread below) find it decent)<br />
Excelent true blacks<br />
Excelent motion handling<br />
Ambilight Spectra 3 (some find it distoring (you can set a static backlight level/color or disable if you do) &#8211; I adore it)<br />
No PC HDMI handshake problems<br />
Decent sound system (althou I don&#8217;t use mine, I have a dedicated speaker system)<br />
Nice colors (after calibration)<br />
No blooming<br />
No (low) reflections<br />
Decent viewing angles<br />
Superb (imho) exterior design<br />
Built-in Wifi/Ethernet and Internet features  (Although I don&#8217;t use those :) )</p>
<p>Some cons:<br />
Default color gammut is not &#8220;on spot&#8221; (calibration needed, too much &#8220;blue tint&#8221; by default)<br />
No HD MKV playback from usb/wifi/net<br />
Some HW board failures (green strip) for a few owners (see the thread below)<br />
Price (although it is a premium tv)<br />
Different (some say lower quality) sharp panel in 40&#8243; and 46&#8243; (some banding for a few owners)<br />
Thick (the 52&#8243; is about 11 cm) and heavy (~50 kilos)</p>
<p>PS. Here&#8217;s a very nice owners thread with lots of info:<br />
<a href="http://www.hifi-forum.de/viewthread-152-5345-91.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hifi-forum.de/viewthread-152-5345-91.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
