<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mid to High-End LCD TVs: Motion Blur a Non Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/03/mid-to-high-end-lcd-tvs-motion-blur-a-non-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/03/mid-to-high-end-lcd-tvs-motion-blur-a-non-issue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philips 9704 LED Pro: 40-inch 40PFL9704, 46-inch 46PFL9704 — DisplayBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2009/11/03/mid-to-high-end-lcd-tvs-motion-blur-a-non-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>Philips 9704 LED Pro: 40-inch 40PFL9704, 46-inch 46PFL9704 — DisplayBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displayblog.com/?p=7561#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>[...] 100Hz or 200Hz won&#8217;t do much to reduce motion blur. If you haven&#8217;t already, read &#8220;Mid to High-End LCD TVs: Motion Blur a Non Issue&#8220;. The article explains what DisplayMate&#8217;s Dr. Raymond M. Soneira found testing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 100Hz or 200Hz won&#8217;t do much to reduce motion blur. If you haven&#8217;t already, read &#8220;Mid to High-End LCD TVs: Motion Blur a Non Issue&#8220;. The article explains what DisplayMate&#8217;s Dr. Raymond M. Soneira found testing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
