<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujitsu DoCoMo PRIME F-01A: 3.5&#8243; Mobile Phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.displayblog.com/2008/11/19/fujitsu-docomo-prime-f-01a-35-mobile-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2008/11/19/fujitsu-docomo-prime-f-01a-35-mobile-phone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jin</title>
		<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2008/11/19/fujitsu-docomo-prime-f-01a-35-mobile-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displayblog.com/?p=3050#comment-845</guid>
		<description>OLED is definitely at the top when it comes to display technology for smaller-sized applications such as mobile phones. The price might have been prohibitive, but at the high-end the customers usually have a lot of disposable income. Usually. We&#039;ll definitely see more high-end mobile gadgets sporting OLED displays for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OLED is definitely at the top when it comes to display technology for smaller-sized applications such as mobile phones. The price might have been prohibitive, but at the high-end the customers usually have a lot of disposable income. Usually. We&#8217;ll definitely see more high-end mobile gadgets sporting OLED displays for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mertero</title>
		<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2008/11/19/fujitsu-docomo-prime-f-01a-35-mobile-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>mertero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displayblog.com/?p=3050#comment-842</guid>
		<description>They should have used a 3.5&quot; OLED for the main display, not just the external one ;-)

http://www.oled-info.com/tags/oled_display_modules

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have used a 3.5&#8243; OLED for the main display, not just the external one ;-)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oled-info.com/tags/oled_display_modules" rel="nofollow">http://www.oled-info.com/tags/oled_display_modules</a></p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
