<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vizio 47&#8243; 1080p LCD TV: Less Than $2000 in February 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.displayblog.com/2006/12/16/vizio-47-1080p-lcd-tv-less-than-2000-in-february-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2006/12/16/vizio-47-1080p-lcd-tv-less-than-2000-in-february-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mustek LTV-4210: 42&#34; 1080p LCD TV &#171; DisplayBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.displayblog.com/2006/12/16/vizio-47-1080p-lcd-tv-less-than-2000-in-february-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Mustek LTV-4210: 42&#34; 1080p LCD TV &#171; DisplayBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2006/12/16/vizio-47-1080p-lcd-tv-less-than-2000-in-february-2007/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] Mustek is even less known than Vizio. With Vizio&#8217;s 42&#8243; 1080p LCD TV offering to come in at less than $2000, Mustek&#8217;s price should be even lower. Otherwise, I&#8217;d go with the Vizio brand if the two were my only choices. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mustek is even less known than Vizio. With Vizio&#8217;s 42&#8243; 1080p LCD TV offering to come in at less than $2000, Mustek&#8217;s price should be even lower. Otherwise, I&#8217;d go with the Vizio brand if the two were my only choices. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
